Advocating for Homeowners' Rights in Planned Communities

Resize text-+=

New Jersey HOA Discussion Forum

Read these Guidelines

  • What you post here is open to anyone who joins this forum as a guest or member.
  • Please make sure your post is relevant to HOAs in
    New Jersey.
  • No advertising.
  • Keep it clean – as if your grandmother were reading it!
  • Useful, professional, and specific language is best.
  • No discrimination of any kind will be tolerated.
  • Contact us if you would like a new category posted in this forum.
Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Appeals Court rules NJ Town restricting OWNERSHIP for those <55yrs old in senior community is discriminatory

By: Nikita Biryukov - July 31, 2024 

New Jersey municipalities cannot restrict housing ownership by age, a state appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The three-judge panel found a Berkeley Township ordinance that bars individuals under the age of 55 from owning homes at certain senior housing communities runs afoul of discrimination protections in the federal Fair Housing Act and New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination.

“By setting a minimum age for property ownership in retirement communities, the ordinance was discriminatory, and the restriction did not fall within the limited housing for older persons exemption,” Appellate Division Judge Greta Gooden Brown wrote for the court.

Though federal law gives local governments the ability to restrict housing to elderly residents, those restrictions can only be placed on housing occupancy, not ownership, the court found.

Their decision affirms a lower court ruling that found merit to arguments by New Jersey Realtors, an industry group, that charged ownership restrictions would depress home sales by shrinking the pool of eligible buyers and leave elderly residents unable to bequeath their properties to younger family members.

The court added ownership restrictions chafe uncomfortably against property rights guarantees in the Fourteenth Amendment and would likely not pass a balancing test that weighs the public need against the injury to residents’ rights.

“Applying that standard, we conclude the Ordinance unreasonably infringes upon the well-established and constitutionally protected right to own and sell property and the restriction unreasonably and irrationally exceeds the public need,” Gooden Brown wrote.

Accessibility Toolbar

We’re collecting information to see where most of the problems are in NJ HOA communities. Skip the questions if you want to simply join the list.

Let us know your HOA Issues!